For companies which have yet to realize the importance of implementation and training of AML programs it is worth considering the potential costs and risks of having an inadequate approach to money laundering. Besides financial lose due to penalties companies face various other risks such as reputational risks, regulatory risks, legal risks and concentration risks as result of non-compliance with AML policies. Companies conducting business internationally have a higher risk factor especially those subject to the AML regimes of the UK and the US. Such companies are increasingly looking to deal with other companies with a strong AML program in place in order to help meet their own AML regulatory requirements and to avoid guilt by association. The biggest risk for any organisation besides financial lose is potential damage to its reputation arising from the organisation’s alleged involvement in money laundering or even worse, terrorism. In today’s world no organisation can stand the risk of association with terrorism. Clearly its up to the organisation’s chartered secretaries and MLRO (Money Laundering Reporting Officer) to promote the message and its importance within the company.
As costly and time-consuming AML compliance will be for an organisation, there are a range of real benefits to be gained from a robust AML compliance program that has been endorsed by its governing body including:
- Increased revenue and marketing opportunities through the acquisition of more comprehensive and reliable customer information through KYC and Due Diligence.
- Reducing bad debts and fraud losses as a result of enhanced customer due diligence
- Improving operational efficiencies through more integrated and automated management of financial crime
- Reducing the risks of exposure to corruption, identity crime, terrorist financing and a range of other potentially damaging criminal activities
- Enhancing the overall control and risk environment by tightly linking AML to broader operational risk measures with potentially favourable outcomes for capital adequacy requirements.
No comments:
Post a Comment